|
Instructions to Judges, Becoming a
Judge & Scoring Sheets
Instructions to
Judges
- CONTACT: Judges must not discuss anything with
the participants about their performance or participation
until after the final competition or it will be considered
coaching and the participant will be disqualified if they
have made the finals. If you want to make a helpful comment
to the dancer please make certain you include it on their
preliminary judging sheet, as they will receive it before
the final competition.
- MUSIC CHOICE: Performances must be primarily to Middle Eastern music.
One piece of alternative (non "Middle Eastern") music may be included in any competition
set and must total less than 1/2 of the total performance
time. If alternative music is used, consider strongly whether
the performer managed to somehow expand on it as a creative
theme instead of appearing to have chosen it because they
simply liked it or thought it would influence the audience
on its own. If you do not like the style of music the contestant
has selected, please try to be objective.
- PROPS: For the recorded preliminary competition any props may be
included, though in the final live competition fire and animals
may not be used. No extra points should be directly given for even
difficult props (though
incompetent handling of a prop should obviously hurt a score).
Props can improve the overall entertainment quality, but
giving points to someone for trying to do something is not
reasonable when another dancer succeeds at a better performance
without it.
- ZILLS: Well-played finger cymbals are eligible for a
basic extra credit, as you will note on the score sheets.
If they enhance or harm another area of their dance it is
okay to let that affect other scores.
- STYLE: All styles of "Belly Dance" performer are accepted.
Our goal is to find someone qualified with the ability
to be a good International Ambassador to the general public for Belly
Dance. You will be instructed in "the question"
to consider the likely impact of the performer on general
public opinion, and a favorable opinion can be made with
any style of belly dance regardless of your own preferences.
Please try to be objective.
- "THE QUESTION" : Please note that along with the usual standard types of
competition criteria, you will be given the special criteria
of being instructed to judge the performances based on
the suitability of the performance as an International Ambassador of Belly
Dance to the public. You will be asked to evaluate
the performers with the specific question: "Is this performer
someone you would want your boss, your grandmother, your children,
your neighbor, your [someone important to you] to see for
the first time as an example of what you do?" Your answer
will be very subjective as different people have different
backgrounds, experiences, and opinions... as do our
audiences. What I want you to focus on is evaluating if
you would be proud (or at least fairly comfortable) to
point at this performer and say: "YES! I DO THAT!"
in a more sensitive situation. We are asking for your honest
gut level evaluation. The performer will not be given your
specific comments, just the numeric scoring for that segment
of the judging sheet. The specific comments will be turned
in with the judging sheets to ensure the judge can
make some personal justification for the evaluation, and
to help compile a list of tips for performers in future
years. If a judge feels their specific personal objections
or compliments should go to the performer then the judge
must add them to the International Ambassador quality comments area on
the score sheets that will be given to the performers.
- VIDEO QUALITY ISSUES: Judges are instructed to ignore the setting of the recorded
performance and the quality of the recording and simply evaluate
the performance according to the judging criteria, but if either
of these factors distracts or detracts from viewing the content
of the performance feel free to judge accodingly. Obviously
you can't judge on what you can't see. Try to avoid
being influenced by the professionalism level of the videographer
or the level of the equipment used. Try to be objective
and aware of the impacts of the audience energy. This may
be difficult to evaluate with recordings likely to range
from live performances to stage performances to commercial
recordings to recordings shot in the garage. But remember
that although it often helps a performer to have a
live audience, it also can distract the performer --
and conversely a good performer can project and be charismatic
in an empty room.
- VIDEO EDITS: Video edits during the recorded performances
are a cause for disqualification. If you see an edit that
we have missed please note the performer and the time
and email or call Saqra immediately. saqra@saqra.net
or 253-813-8580 so it can be re-evaluated. The theory is
that with many suspicious Judge's eyes on the recordings
we won't miss much.
- COPYING & EXHIBITING DVDS: Do not copy, distribute,
or exhibit the recordings presented to you for judging on
DVD. This is a condition of judging. Anyone discovered or reported
copying and/or distributing or exhibiting the recordings
in any way now or in the future will be put on a public
list of former judges who have done so, as well as
their name being included in repeated public warnings
about the issue and the person's involvement. REWARD:
The first person turning in a judge for the confirmed violation
of any of this request will receive a reward of $500 US. Names
will be kept confidential. --- The YouTube
recordings are protected by the YouTube process itself.
Our intent is to make the attempt to assure the same kind
of protection to the people submitting DVDs.
- GENERAL: Judges will receive the compiled recordings
& list of YouTube addresses between Aug 25 and Sept
5. We will need you to view and judge the performances in
your judging category by Sept 20 and then please immediately
return the recordings and your judging sheets in the postage
paid envelope provided. Once again, please return
the DVDs and all judging sheets on Sept 20 or earlier.
- SUGGESTIONS ON WATCHING RECORDINGS: It is not recommended
you watch and judge all the performances in one marathon
session. It is recommended you watch them in reasonably
sized batches so you do not become to fatigued fairly
compare performances. Before beginning to judge a batch
of entrant's performances, please watch the extra video
provided for preview (even if you have already seen it several
times). This will tend to bring you back to the same viewpoint
and mood you were in when you judged the last set of performances
and allow you to judge as fairly and consistantly as possible.
And try to watch YouTube performances as a group and
DVD performances as a group as the YouTube performance are
all probably going to be more restricted in size and therefore
more similar
- WATCH ALONE: Please watch and judge the performances
alone if at all possible. Your 3 year old toddler won't
turn you in for the $500 reward as your 10-year-old or dance
student might, but anyone in the room can change your mood
and perspective and break your attention and concentration.
If you choose to take the chance and violate this, please
remember that you were requested to Judge because your opinion
is valued for whatever reason... for your experience, knowledge,
skill, known ability to be objective ... and any person
joining you in viewing the DVDs is likely to voice their
opinion and modify yours. We only care about your opinion.
Becoming a Judge
- JUDGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: DVD player, internet connection,
mailing address, time you are willing to devote, ability
and willingness to comply with the requests above. You may
be any nationality, any gender, any age to be considered
as a judge, though it is recommended you speak and write
English or be aware you will need someone to assist you
with this. Please advise if you are in a country that has
limited access to YouTube so that we can make arrangements
with the competitors to copy their performance to DVD for
you. Our DVDs will be converted to non-region for judging
and will be transferred to PAL if needed.
- BEING CONSIDERED AS A PRELIMINARY ROUND VIDEO JUDGE: Please
contact Saqra at saqra@saqra.net
or 253-813-8580 or mail your resume or bio to Saqra,
23625 41St Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 if you are interested in judging the video
segment. Please tell her what category or categories you
are interested in judging and/or feel qualified to judge.
If Saqra definitely knows you personally and knows your
qualifications then just being informed of your interest
and willingness could be enough. If Saqra does not know
you personally or does not know you well, you should
consider contacting her with some information about yourself.
Even if you think Saqra should know your qualifications,
please be aware she does not keep track of everything everyone
has done and you may be inadvertantly passed over in favor
of someone who has presented their resume for the sake of
expedience.
- Please be prepared to send a bio and photo suitable
for the competition web site if you are selected and would
like to be included as more than a name on the official
web site info. Names of video judges will be announced on
the web site after the preliminary judging is completed.
- BEING SCHEDULED/CONFIRMED AS A PRELIMINARY ROUND JUDGE: Will
be announced to you as soon as the pool of judges is filled.
There will be an attempt to coordinate the group of
interested judges into areas where they are and/or feel
best qualified and to attempt to minimize the sheer workload
on any one judge by using the group most effectively.
- FINAL ROUND JUDGE: Preference will be given to judges
of the preliminary competitions, but is not restricted to
them. If you are interested in attending
as a finals judge at the event in Oregon, please contact Saqra
at saqra@saqra.net
or 253-813-8580 or mail your resume or biography to
Saqra, 23625 41St Ave S, Kent, WA 98032.
- If you
are wishing to judge and also a workshop instructor please include information on your workshops. We
would like to showcase a portion of the judges in workshop
as space is available in the schedule.
- Judges teaching workshops will receive the same hourly
payment rate for their workshops as other invited instructors. We do not pay your
travel and are unable to do extensive pickup and dropoff
at the airport, though our volunteers will probably be
able to assist you with some needed rides locally. It is quite reasonable
to expect to be able to get to the event site and hotel
(Hotel B - formerly the Red Lion)
on your own from the airport on the MAXX train, and there
are facilities and shopping within reasonalble walking distance
of the event site. We will have a certain amount of lodging
available for out-of-town judges, but do note you would
be roomed with other judges as we do with our April workshop
instructors.
- Finals Judges will also be given a vending table or
a smaller portion of a vending table space if they desire.
- PLEASE NOTE: If any judge of preliminary or final competitions
turns in scores that appear to be very significantly inconsistent
either within their own apparent style of judging or
when compared to the scores of all other judges, their scores
will be removed from consideration. This subjective evaluation
and determination will only be made by Saqra and will be
final. The judge in question will still be included in the
web site as a listed judge and the performer will still
receive their completed judging sheets, but the sheets will
be -- and will be marked that they were -- eliminated
from the final scoring.
TENTATIVE Scoring Sheets
SOLOIST CATEGORIES
Contestant _______________ Judge ______________
APPEARANCE
Overall attractiveness of the performer should
be considered but specific natural faults overlooked.
COSTUMING - Type and style are largely to
be ignored.
N Y Y+ FITS
WELL – is clearly correct size for the performer
N Y Y+ IN
GOOD CONDITION – clean and appears to be in good repair
N Y Y+ IN
GOOD TASTE – appropriate for a family venue
N Y Y+ GOOD
CHOICE – for the body type and style of dancer
N Y Y+ APPROPRIATE
FOR TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF DANCE – does not expose the dancer
or fight the dancer during dance movements
N Y Y+ APPROPRIATE
FOR MUSICAL ASPECTS OF DANCE – costume reflects musical content
if alternative or specific ethnic musical choices are used
N Y Y+ DOES
NOT DISTRACT FROM THE DANCING – overpowers the dancer, too busy,
makes audience spend significant time speculating about undergarments
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
OTHER APPEARANCE ISSUES
N Y Y+ SUFFICIENT
MAKE-UP – for the venue & lighting, for general interest
N Y Y+ HAIR
– apparently clean, does not constantly detract from performance
N Y Y+ OTHER
DETAILS – care given to selecting details as appropriate to
style: nails, accessories, etc
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
APPEARANCE CATEGORY - Points Awarded (0-100):
______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
TECHNICAL SKILL
N Y Y+ POSTURE
N Y Y+ USE
/ ISOLATION OF PARTS
N Y Y+ APPARENT
EASE OF EXECUTING MOVEMENTS
N Y Y+ SMOOTH
TRANSITIONS
N Y Y+ GOOD
PRESENTATION & FRAMING OF MOVEMENT
N Y Y+ GRACEFULNESS
& SENSE OF CONTROL
N Y Y+ SKILL
AT HANDLING ANY PROPS USED
N Y Y+ GOOD
USE OF FINGER CYMBALS (2 pts will be added to score for Y+ during
calculations)
N Y Y+ QUALITY
ENTRANCE & EXIT
N Y Y+ JUDGE'S
SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF DANCER'S TECHNICAL SKILL
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
TECHNICAL SKILL CATEGORY - Points Awarded
(0-100): ______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
ENTERTAINMENT ABILITY
N Y Y+ CHARISMA
& AUDIENCE CONNECTION – ability to reach the audience and elicit
personal attraction/appreciation
N Y Y+ MAINTAINING
ATTENTION – ability to keep the audience attentive to the entire
performance
N Y Y+ COMMUNICATION
SKILL – communicating the mood of the music by body and/or facial
expression
N Y Y+ DISTINCT
PERSONAL STYLE
N Y Y+ SENSE
OF CONFIDENCE & POISE
N Y Y+ JUDGE'S
SUBJECTIVE LEVEL OF ENJOYMENT – were you entertained, or did
the dancer simply seem technically skilled (if that)?
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
ENTERTAINMENT ABILITY CATEGORY - Points Awarded
(0-100): ______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
ROUTINE CONTENT
N Y Y+ VARIETY
IN MOOD – multiple moods presented
N Y Y+ VARIETY
IN STYLE – multiple styles of music presented
N Y Y+ VARIETY
IN STYLE SUPPORT – various styles were supported by an appropriate
change in prop, costuming or dance
N Y Y+ ALTERNATIVE
MUSIC – if used, were words understandable if dancer was acting
upon them
N Y Y+ ALTERNATIVE
MUSIC SUPPORT – was there a creative reason for the use of alternative
music? Was it reflected in another way? Movement
choices? Costuming?
N Y Y+ VARIETY
OF MOVEMENTS
N Y Y+ GOOD
USE OF STAGE / SPACE
N Y Y+ FRESHNESS
IN CHOREOGRAPHY OR IMPROVISATION – dance does not look
over-rehearsed
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
ROUTINE CONTENT CATEGORY - Points Awarded
(0-100): ______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
SUITABILITY AS AN AMBASSADOR
The goal of this competition is to find a
highly skilled performer (or performers) with the ability to
be a good ambassador to people who know little about this art
form. Certain factors help this field to grow in appeal to the
general public and eventually become a mainstream and generally
accepted art form: presenting a high quality and entertaining
performance, being personally appealing and therefore attracting
people to try the art or be more interested in watching the
art, and not offending the largest portion of a populace with
a variety of life experiences and beliefs... a populace with
a large variety of ages.
In awarding points the Judges are considering
the following questions:
WHAT IMPRESSION DID THE DANCER GIVE ABOUT
"BELLY DANCERS?"
WHAT IMPRESSION DID THE DANCER GIVE ABOUT
"BELLY DANCING?"
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
SUITABILITY AS AN AMBASSADOR – Points Awarded
(0-100):______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
Tentative SCORING SHEETS
DUET/TRIO & TROUPE
CATEGORIES
Contestant _______________ Judge ______________
APPEARANCE
Overall attractiveness of the performer should
be considered but specific natural faults overlooked.
APPEARANCE
COSTUMING - Type and style are largely to
be ignored.
N Y Y+ FITS
WELL – is clearly correct size for the performers
N Y Y+ IN
GOOD CONDITION – clean and appears to be in good repair
N Y Y+ IN
GOOD TASTE – appropriate for a family venue
N Y Y+ GOOD
CHOICE – for the body types and style of dancers as individuals
and as a whole
N Y Y+ APPROPRIATE
FOR TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF DANCE – does not expose the dancers
or fight the dancers during dance movements
N Y Y+ APPROPRIATE
FOR MUSICAL ASPECTS OF DANCE – costume reflects musical content
if alternative or specific ethnic musical choices are used
N Y Y+ DOES
NOT DISTRACT FROM THE DANCING – overpowers the dancers, too
busy, makes audience spend significant time speculating about
undergarments
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
OTHER APPEARANCE ISSUES
N Y Y+ SUFFICIENT
MAKE-UP – for the venue & lighting, for general interest
N Y Y+ HAIR
– apparently clean, does not constantly detract from performance
N Y Y+ OTHER
DETAILS – care given to selecting details as appropriate to
style: nails, accessories, etc
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
APPEARANCE CATEGORY - Points Awarded (0-100):
______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
TECHNICAL SKILL
N Y Y+ DANCERS
APPEAR WELL BALANCED IN SKILL LEVEL
N Y Y+ USE
/ ISOLATION OF PARTS
N Y Y+ APPARENT
EASE OF EXECUTING MOVEMENTS
N Y Y+ SMOOTH
TRANSITIONS
N Y Y+ GOOD
PRESENTATION & FRAMING OF MOVEMENT
N Y Y+ GRACEFULNESS
& SENSE OF CONTROL
N Y Y+ SKILL
AT HANDLING ANY PROPS USED
N Y Y+ GOOD
USE OF FINGER CYMBALS (2 pts will be added to score for Y+ during
calculations)
N Y Y+ QUALITY
ENTRANCE & EXIT
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
TECHNICAL SKILL CATEGORY - Points Awarded
(0-100): ______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
ENTERTAINMENT ABILITY
N Y Y+ CHARISMA
& AUDIENCE CONNECTION – ability to reach the audience and
elicit personal attraction/appreciation
N Y Y+ MAINTAINING
ATTENTION – ability to keep the audience attentive to the entire
performance
N Y Y+ COMMUNICATION
SKILL – communicating the mood of the music by body and/or facial
expression
N Y Y+ DISTINCT
PERSONAL STYLE – as a group. Variety & routine selection
could be a factor.
N Y Y+ SENSE
OF CONFIDENCE & POISE
N Y Y+ JUDGE'S
SUBJECTIVE LEVEL OF ENJOYMENT – were you entertained, or did
the group simply seem technically skilled (if that)?
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
ENTERTAINMENT ABILITY CATEGORY - Points Awarded
(0-100): ______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
ROUTINE CONTENT
N Y Y+ VARIETY
IN MOOD – multiple moods presented
N Y Y+ VARIETY
IN STYLE – multiple styles of music presented
N Y Y+ VARIETY
IN STYLE SUPPORT – various styles were supported by An appropriate change
in prop, costuming or dance
N Y Y+ ALTERNATIVE
MUSIC – if used, were words understandable if dancer was acting
upon them
N Y Y+ ALTERNATIVE
MUSIC SUPPORT – was there a creative reason for the use of alternative
music? Was it reflected in another way? Movement choices? Costuming?
N Y Y+ VARIETY
OF MOVEMENTS
N Y Y+ GOOD
USE OF STAGE / SPACE
N Y Y+ PRECISION
DANCING – well rehearsed and together
N Y Y+ GROUP
COHESION – dancers work as a unit to produce the group team
performance instead of as soloists. Performance must appear
to be a group effort.
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
ROUTINE CONTENT CATEGORY - Points Awarded
(0-100): ______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
SUITABILITY AS AMBASSADORS
The goal of this competition is to find a
highly skilled performer (or performers) with the ability to
be a good ambassador to people who know little about this art
form. Certain factors help this field to grow in appeal to the
general public and eventually become a mainstream and generally
accepted art form: presenting a high quality and entertaining
performance, being personally appealing and therefore attracting
people to try the art or be more interested in watching the
art, and not offending the largest portion of a populace with
a variety of life experiences and beliefs... a populace with
a large variety of ages.
In awarding points the Judges are considering
the following questions:
WHAT IMPRESSION DID THE DANCERS GIVE ABOUT
"BELLY DANCERS?"
WHAT IMPRESSION DID THE DANCERS GIVE ABOUT
"BELLY DANCING?"
BEST QUALITIES:
COULD BE IMPROVED & SUGGESTIONS:
SUITABILITY AS AN AMBASSADOR – Points Awarded
(0-100):______
|
Points
|
Grade Eq.
|
Description
|
|
90-100
|
A+
|
A superior / outstanding performance.
|
|
80-89
|
A
|
A very good / excellent performance.
|
|
70-79
|
B
|
A good / above average
performance.
|
|
60-69
|
C
|
A generally satisfactory to
adequate performance.
|
|
50-59
|
D
|
A barely satisfactory performance.
|
|
0-49
|
-
|
An unacceptable performance.
|
|